Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2211 - 2220 of 12359 results
Rath v. Rath
2018 ND 98
Highlight: A claim for relief is frivolous only if there is such a complete absence of actual facts or law a reasonable person could not have expected a court would render a judgment in that person's favor. |
Rocky Mountain Steel Foundations, Inc. v. Brockett Company, LLC, et al.
2018 ND 96
Highlight: An owner's full payment of the general contractor after receipt of notice of a subcontractor's oil and gas construction lien does not invalidate the subcontractor's lien. |
State v. Gunn
2018 ND 95
Highlight: The criminal attempt statute does not require that the underlying offense be committed. |
Olson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2018 ND 94
Highlight: The revocation of driving privileges for refusal to submit to chemical testing requires a valid arrest. |
State v. Wilder
2018 ND 93
Highlight: A comment on the defendant's post-arrest silence is an improper comment on the right to remain silent in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. |
State v. Rutherford
2018 ND 91 Highlight: A district court's criminal judgment ordering restitution is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Interest of R.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 90 Highlight: A district court's order for continued treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of S.B. (Consolidated w/20180057)(CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 89 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Thorstad v. State
2018 ND 88 Highlight: Summary dismissal of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
State v. Ali
2018 ND 87 Highlight: Warrantless, limited entry by a police officer into an open garage does not violate a defendant's federal or state constitutional rights under the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement. |