Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2471 - 2480 of 12279 results
|
Moline v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2017 ND 7 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order terminating a claimant's disability benefits, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
|
State v. Harrison
2017 ND 6 Highlight: Conviction on four counts of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4), and (7). |
|
State v. Catch the Bear
2017 ND 5 Highlight: Conviction of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Lowe v. WSI
2017 ND 4 Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing an appeal from an administrative order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. Moreland (consolidated w/20160268)
2017 ND 3 Highlight: A district court's order denying a request to correct an illegal sentence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Nelson (consolidated w/20160225)(cross-ref. w/20150212)
2017 ND 2 Highlight: A district court's order for restitution is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Interest of Voisine (cross-ref. w/20090182, 20100163, 20120325 & 20140051)
2016 ND 254
Highlight: Courts are not restricted to actuarial tests in determining whether an individual is likely to engage in further acts of predatory conduct; all relevant conduct should be considered. |
|
Castillo v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 253
Highlight: When statutory language is clear and unambiguous, the letter of the statute cannot be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit. |
|
Koenig v. Schuh, et al.
2016 ND 252 Highlight: A civil personal injury litigant is not constitutionally or statutorily entitled to a free transcript. |
|
Rasmussen v. Harvey
2016 ND 251 Highlight: The district court must balance one party's financial needs against the other party's ability to pay when awarding attorney's fees and costs in divorce proceedings. |