Opinions

Glende v. State 2017 ND 84
Docket No.: 20160304
Filing Date: 4/12/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court judgment summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Rufus v. State 2017 ND 83
Docket No.: 20160445
Filing Date: 4/12/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

City of Gwinner v. Vincent 2017 ND 82
Docket No.: 20160223
Filing Date: 4/6/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A person arrested for DUI has a limited statutory right to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test.
The reasonableness of the opportunity to consult with an attorney before taking a chemical test for DUI is evaluated under the totality of the circumstances.
A law enforcement officer provided reasonable opportunity to a DUI arrestee who is unable to reach his lawyer and makes no further requests.

City of Dickinson v. Schank 2017 ND 81
Docket No.: 20160254
Filing Date: 4/6/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A person arrested for driving or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence has a limited statutory right to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test.
A DUI or APC arrestee being asked to submit to a chemical test is, upon request, entitled to a reasonable opportunity to contact a lawyer before deciding whether to take the test. The reasonableness of the opportunity to consult with counsel is evaluated under the totality of the circumstances.

Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20150133) 2017 ND 80
Docket No.: 20160169
Filing Date: 4/5/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Threats and activity intended to embarrass, annoy, or harass are not constitutionally protected speech.
Challenges to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at anytime, even for the first time at oral argument.
The denial of a motion for reconsideration confirms the district court's order.

State v. Conrad 2017 ND 79
Docket No.: 20160301
Filing Date: 4/4/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Whether the civil dispute doctrine applies in a criminal case is a question of law.
A joint account holder may be charged with theft and exploitation of a vulnerable adult for misuse of joint account funds.
The civil dispute doctrine bars criminal prosecution if the case presents a legitimate dispute on a unique issue of property, contract, or other civil law, and the issues in the case would be more appropriately settled in a civil forum.
For the civil dispute doctrine to apply, resolution of the legitimate dispute on a unique issue of civil law must impact the public in general, rather than only the defendant and the alleged victim in the criminal case.

THR Minerals, LLC. v. Robinson, et al. 2017 ND 78
Docket No.: 20160062
Filing Date: 4/3/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Assignments and deeds are interpreted in the same manner as contracts, with the primary purpose to ascertain and effectuate the parties' or grantor's intent.
When an assignment is memorialized in a clear and unambiguous writing, a court should not look to extrinsic evidence to ascertain intent.

Stewart v. State 2017 ND 77
Docket No.: 20160253
Filing Date: 3/30/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An applicant for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must establish counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and the deficient performance prejudiced the applicant's defense.
In opposing a State's motion for summary disposition, an applicant for post-conviction relief may not merely rely on the pleadings or on unsupported conclusory allegations but must present competent admissible evidence by affidavit or other comparable means which raises an issue of material fact.

Voigt v. N.D. Public Service Commission, et al. 2017 ND 76
Docket No.: 20160046
Filing Date: 3/30/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Section 38-14.1-21, N.D.C.C., provides for surface coal mining permit approval and denial standards, including protection for statutorily-defined "alluvial valley floors," certain types of valleys with special importance to farming.
In reviewing an administrative agency's findings of fact, courts determine only whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proved by the weight of the evidence from the entire record.
Courts generally defer to an administrative agency's reasonable interpretation of its own regulations when the language is so technical that only a specialized agency has the experience and expertise to understand it or when the language is ambiguous.

State v. Webster 2017 ND 75
Docket No.: 20160155
Filing Date: 3/30/2017
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An individual may not be criminally prosecuted for refusing a warrantless blood test incident to arrest.
The requirements for requesting an onsite breath screening test are not essential elements of the crime of refusing an onsite breath screening test.