Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2491 - 2500 of 12279 results
|
Jacobs-Raak v. Raak
2016 ND 240
Highlight: When the parties agree to a division of property, the district court should explain its reasons for not dividing the property according to that agreement. |
|
Interest of R.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 239 Highlight: A district court order continuing R.F.'s hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Young, n/k/a Klein v. Young (cross-ref. w/20070293)
2016 ND 238 Highlight: District court order denying motion to change primary residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(4), and (7). |
|
State v. Ortiz
2016 ND 237 Highlight: A district court's denial of a request to withdraw a guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(4). |
|
Schaffner v. Job Service North Dakota
2016 ND 236 Highlight: District court judgment affirming Job Service's decision denying unemployment insurance benefits is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(5) & (7). |
|
State v. Williams
2016 ND 235 Highlight: A criminal judgment following a jury conviction for gross sexual imposition and burglary is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(2), (3), and (7). |
|
Fredericks v. Fredericks, et al.
2016 ND 234
Highlight: Once tribal land is converted into fee simple, the tribe loses plenary jurisdiction over it. |
|
CHS Inc. v. Riemers
2016 ND 233 Highlight: As modified for prejudgment interest, appeal from summary judgment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6). |
|
State v. Karna
2016 ND 232 Highlight: Information from an informant whose identity is easily ascertainable has a higher indicia of reliability than information obtained from an anonymous informant. |
|
Schweitzer v. Mattingley
2016 ND 231
Highlight: A district court judge does not automatically lose the authority to proceed in a case upon the filing of a motion to recuse. |