Opinions

State v. Nguyen 2013 ND 252
Docket No.: 20130159
Filing Date: 12/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The use of a drug-sniffing dog in a common hallway of a secured apartment building does not constitute an unreasonable search.

Tollefson v. Bjornstad, et al. (cross-reference w/20120347) 2013 ND 251
Docket No.: 20130229
Filing Date: 12/24/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to vacate prior orders entered in a civil RICO action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Disciplinary Board v. Hardwick (Consolidated w/ 20130289) 2013 ND 250
Docket No.: 20130288
Filing Date: 12/23/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer discipline imposed.

Dominguez v. State 2013 ND 249
Docket No.: 20130098
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: To commit an attempt offense, the accused must have an intent to commit the underlying crime.
Attempted murder committed under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life is not a cognizable offense, because the accused must have an intent to kill for attempted murder and murder under circumstance manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life results in an unintentional death.

Guthmiller Farms v. Guthmiller, et al. 2013 ND 248
Docket No.: 20130156
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A limited liability partnership that loses its registration is still a partnership for the purposes of conducting business. A successor partnership has the ability to sue and be sued in the name of the partnership under N.D.C.C. 45-15-07.
A consideration clause in an agreement is presumptive evidence that consideration exists for the agreement.
Consideration may be executed or executory in whole or in part, so long as it was given in consideration of the agreement at issue.

Interest of D.O. (Confidential) 2013 ND 247
Docket No.: 20130174
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Juvenile Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included.
All information providing probable cause must be considered together, and in a commonsense and realistic fashion.
The right to confrontation is a trial right and does not apply to the same extent in pretrial hearings.
The State must show reasonable grounds exist to transfer a juvenile's case to the district court.

Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20130010) 2013 ND 246
Docket No.: 20120447
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A clerical error correctable under N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 includes a failure to accurately record action taken by the court, but the rule does not extend to correction of errors of substance.
Resentencing under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35 is proper in order to correct an illegal sentence.
Probationary sentences for conviction of the crime of failure to register as a sexual offender are imposed under N.D.C.C. 12.1-32-15(9), not N.D.C.C. 12.1-32-06.1(3).

Krueger v. Krueger (Cross-reference w/20070196) 2013 ND 245
Docket No.: 20130129
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A party seeking a contempt sanction must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed. An inability to comply with an order is a defense to contempt proceedings, but the alleged contemnor has the burden to prove the defense.

Stensland v. Disciplinary Board 2013 ND 244
Docket No.: 20130008
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A suspended lawyer has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence the requisite honesty and integrity to be reinstated to the practice of law.
A suspended lawyer who is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and who makes false claims to the Supreme Court has failed to satisfy his burden for reinstatement.

Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20130327 & 20130025) 2013 ND 243
Docket No.: 20130184
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Technical violations of a court order do not necessarily require a finding of contempt.
A district court's decision on a motion for recusal is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.