Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3361 - 3370 of 12403 results
Hector v. City of Fargo
2014 ND 53
Highlight: An appeal from a decision imposing special assessments provides an adequate legal remedy for challenging special assessments, and a separate action for equitable relief generally will not lie for issues that are raised or could have been raised in the appeal. |
Union Bank v. Tarnavsky, et al. (consol. w/20130387; cross-ref. w/ 20110061)
2014 ND 52 Highlight: Orders denying motions for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(1) and a judgment dismissing a cross-claim in a foreclosure case are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |
Haugland v. City of Bismarck (cross ref. 20110077)
2014 ND 51
Highlight: Summary judgment is inappropriate when one can draw reasonable inferences that support the positions of both sides in a controversy and a fact-finder could draw negative inferences from the absence of documentation or records in a case. |
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Corwin
2014 ND 50
Highlight: In a judicial disciplinary proceeding, whether a judge's conduct constituted sexual harassment as defined under federal or state laws is not a relevant inquiry. |
Rodriguez v. N.D. State Penitentiary, et al.
2014 ND 49 Highlight: An appeal regarding calculation of eligibility for parole becomes moot when the defendant becomes eligible for parole. |
Potratz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 48
Highlight: Repeating the inclusion of the date within the test result portion of an officer's certified report to the Department is not necessary to satisfy the statute. |
Fossum v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 47 Highlight: When a person voluntarily consents to to testing, it is unnecessary to arrest and inform an individual of the reasons for arrest prior to chemical testing under the implied consent. |
State v. Vandermeer
2014 ND 46
Highlight: As an exception to the hearsay rule, a person may testify as to his or her age and date of birth. |
Vandal v. Leno
2014 ND 45
Highlight: In deciding a primary residential responsibility, the district court must consider all the best interest of the child factors. A separate finding for each factor is not required, but the findings must be sufficiently specific to show the factual basis for the decision. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2014 ND 44 Highlight: The Supreme Court may exercise jurisdiction over disciplinary matters arising from federal immigration proceedings involving a North Dakota lawyer. |