Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3421 - 3430 of 12359 results
State v. Klamm
2013 ND 202 Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a conditional guilty plea to driving under suspension is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3), and (7). |
Davis v. State
2013 ND 201 Highlight: A district court judgment summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
City of Fargo v. White
2013 ND 200 Highlight: A district court's summary affirmance of a municipal court judgment under N.D.R.Crim.P. 37(l) may not occur at proceedings which occur before the trial anew. |
State v. Lattergrass
2013 ND 199 Highlight: A criminal judgment for simple assault on a peace officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Peterson v. Pierce, et al.
2013 ND 198 Highlight: In a dispute over a lost rental payment, the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Lang
2013 ND 197 Highlight: Conviction for theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Danuser v. IDA Marketing Corp., et al.
2013 ND 196
Highlight: A director in a closely-held corporation may be liable to a single shareholder for actions that unfairly prejudice the shareholder. |
State v. Evans
2013 ND 195
Highlight: Lay witness testimony, in the form of an opinion, must be rationally based on the perception of the witness and also helpful to the jury's determination of a fact in question. |
State v. Mossey
2013 ND 194 Highlight: Conviction for class B felony luring a minor by computer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Hillerson, et al. v. Bismarck Public Schools, et al.
2013 ND 193
Highlight: When reasonable differences of opinion exist as to the terms of a release of liability provision in a contract, the release of liability provision is ambiguous, and summary judgment is not appropriate. |