Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3411 - 3420 of 12446 results
State v. Benson
2014 ND 43 Highlight: Conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a child is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Coppage v. State (cross reference w/20070304, 20110076, & 20120267)
2014 ND 42
Highlight: Attempted murder under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life is not a cognizable offense. |
Osier v. State
2014 ND 41 Highlight: To meet the prejudice prong of the Strickland ineffective assistance of counsel test, the defendant bears the heavy burden of establishing a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. |
Peterson, et al. v. Jasmanka, et al.
2014 ND 40
Highlight: The statutory procedure in N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1 allowing a surface owner to acquire abandoned minerals is a separate, distinct procedure from a subsequent quiet title action. |
Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-Renner, et al.
2014 ND 39
Highlight: The phrase "resident of your household" in an automobile insurance policy is not ambiguous, and the determination of whether a person falls within the meaning of the phrase is a question of fact. |
Zavadil, et al. v. Rud, et al.
2014 ND 38 Highlight: An accommodation party is obliged to pay an instrument in the capacity in which the accommodation party signs. |
Balvitsch, et al. v. Dakota Burger N Fries Corp., et al.
2014 ND 37
Highlight: Due process requires a contemnor receive notice and a fair hearing when the alleged contempt involves conduct outside the court's presence. |
Tweed v. State
2014 ND 36 Highlight: Appeal from denial of application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Shaft
2014 ND 35 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Anderson, et al. v. Zimbelman, et al.
2014 ND 34
Highlight: Constructive fraud requires a breach of duty leading to an advantage for the party misleading. The breach of duty generally arises from a confidential or fiduciary relationship between the parties. |