Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3401 - 3410 of 12359 results
Disciplinary Board v. Craft
2013 ND 222 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Wolff (Consol. w/ 20130268-20130273)
2013 ND 221 Highlight: Lawyer disbarment ordered. |
Reciprocal Discipline of Kalk
2013 ND 220 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc., et al.
2013 ND 219
Highlight: Use of the words "subject to" in a warranty deed connotes a limitation on the grantor's warranty and not a reservation of rights. |
Van Sickle, et al. v. Hallmark & Assoc., Inc., et al. (cross-reference 20070154
2013 ND 218
Highlight: In a proceeding under N.D.C.C. 47-16-39.1 to recover unpaid oil and gas royalties, a "prevailing party" is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. |
Oakland v. Bowman, et al.
2013 ND 217
Highlight: North Dakota has not adopted equitable tolling as an exception to a statute of limitations. |
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Halvorson
2013 ND 216 Highlight: A party may renew a judgment by either complying with the affidavit procedure under N.D.C.C. 28-20-21 or commencing a separate action on the judgment. |
Estates of Shubert
2013 ND 215
Highlight: An appeal is moot if no actual controversy exists because subsequent events have made it impossible for the court to provide effective relief. |
Moore v. State
2013 ND 214
Highlight: On appeal of a summary dismissal of an application for postconviction relief, a reviewing court must determine whether or not the information available to the district court, when viewed in a light most favorable to the opposing party, precludes the existence of a genuine issue of material fact and entitles the moving party to summary dismissal as a matter of law. |
State v. Blagen
2013 ND 213 Highlight: Criminal judgment for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |