Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3441 - 3450 of 12418 results
|
Bahtiraj v. State
2013 ND 240 Highlight: Without more, the second Strickland prong is not satisfied by a self-serving statement that the petitioner would have insisted on going to trial. Factors to consider when determining the rationality of rejecting a guilty plea and insisting on going to trial include immigration consequences, strength of the case against the petitioner, and rational defenses to the charged crime. |
|
State v. Otto
2013 ND 239 Highlight: The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies to a readily mobile camper that is not in a place regularly used for residential purposes. |
|
Kinsella v. State
2013 ND 238 Highlight: Failure to move pretrial to suppress evidence, by itself, does not equate to ineffective assistance of counsel. Where evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, but where counsel has no reason to question the search and seizure, failure to file a motion to suppress does not render the representation ineffective. |
|
Morton County Social Service Board, et al. v. Houim
2013 ND 237
Highlight: When a party moves to modify primary residential responsibility of a child, the district court must consider only the party's motion on briefs, affidavits, and other supporting documents to determine whether the moving party established a prima facie case and is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. |
|
State v. Canfield
2013 ND 236 Highlight: An inadequate record may make appellate review of the district court's denial of a suppression motion impossible, thus requiring reversal and remand for further proceedings. |
|
Parsons v. WSI
2013 ND 235
Highlight: A claimant for workers' compensation benefits must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition for which benefits are sought is causally related to a work injury. |
|
State v. One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile
2013 ND 234
Highlight: Due process requires that a notice of forfeiture hearing be served on any interested party. |
|
Matter of Muscha
2013 ND 233 Highlight: Order civilly committing appellant as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Fee (consol. 20130177)
2013 ND 232 Highlight: A district court judgment forfeiting property connected to criminal activity is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Ruddell
2013 ND 231 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered for abandonment or nonsupport of a child is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |