Opinions

Schwalk v. Schwalk, et al. 2014 ND 13
Docket No.: 20130225
Filing Date: 1/17/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A hearing is not required by law to modify a child support obligation.
A party seeking modification of a child support obligation has the burden of proving the existing amount of support does not conform to the guidelines.

Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine 2014 ND 12
Docket No.: 20130157
Filing Date: 1/17/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A force majeure clause is equivalent to an affirmative defense.
A party relying on a force majeure clause to excuse performance bears the burden of proving that the event was beyond its control and without its fault or negligence.
Appellant was not a prevailing plaintiff where the district court's award of partial damages to appellant was reversed on appeal.

Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Jensen 2014 ND 11
Docket No.: 20130199
Filing Date: 1/17/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An assignee acquires no greater rights than those of the assignor.
In an action on an assigned claim, the assignee is ordinarily subject to any setoff or counterclaim available to the obligor against the assignor that could have been asserted against the assignor at the time of the assignment.

Phillips v. State 2014 ND 10
Docket No.: 20130151
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale V.

Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending.
When an indigent defendant has demonstrated a particularized need for a transcript, the district court abuses its discretion in denying his request for a free transcript.

Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas 2014 ND 9
Docket No.: 20130214
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order can be sought only against a human being.

Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al. 2014 ND 8
Docket No.: 20130206
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A telephone call is not an appearance entitling a party to notice before entry of default judgment when the party speaks to no one and leaves only a recorded message stating his name and requesting a return call.

Trosen v. Trosen, et al. 2014 ND 7
Docket No.: 20130034
Filing Date: 1/4/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: To satisfy the statute of frauds, a writing must contain all of the essential or material terms and conditions of the contract, and parole evidence may not be used to supply a missing essential term of the agreement.
Part performance of an agreement or contract for the leasing of property for longer than a one-year may bar the assertion of the statute of frauds.
To succeed on a claim of part performance, a party must first prove the circumstances of the case meet the general prerequisites to equitable relief and the party must show that the alleged part performance is consistent only with the existence of the alleged oral contract.

Broadwell v. State (cross-reference w/20120224) 2014 ND 6
Docket No.: 20130211
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so.

Conzemius v. Conzemius 2014 ND 5
Docket No.: 20130125
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A district court is not required to calculate speculative, distant future tax consequences when dividing marital property.
A party's income under the Child Support Guidelines will not necessarily be equal to the party's earning ability under a spousal support analysis.

State v. Hart (consolidated w/20130168) 2014 ND 4
Docket No.: 20130165
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Police may conduct a warrantless protective sweep inside a home when officers possess a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to the officer or others.
A warrantless protective sweep of a home is not justified when officers rely on evidence seized from a different residence and the only connection between the two houses is the fact that one of the suspects was previously at the first residence searched and then left.