Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3471 - 3480 of 12137 results
|
State v. Tresenriter (Consolidated w/20120027-20120049 & 20120057)
2012 ND 240
Highlight: A party who fails to object at trial to admission of offered evidence waives the objection and may not on appeal challenge admission of the evidence. |
|
Schwab v. Zajac
2012 ND 239
Highlight: A party who voluntarily pays a judgment waives the right to appeal from the judgment. |
|
Palmer v. State (consol.w/20110346-20110348)(cross-ref.w/20010123-20010126)
2012 ND 237 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of its rationale for its decision. |
|
Holkesvig v. Welte (cons. w/20120204-205) (cross-ref listed in memo screen)
2012 ND 236 Highlight: A district court judgment finding plaintiff in contempt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4). |
|
Interest of A.J.L.H. (Confidential) (consolidated w/20120383-20120385)
2012 ND 235 Highlight: Juvenile court judgment terminating a mother's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Keita v. Keita
2012 ND 234
Highlight: Parenting time with a noncustodial parent may be curtailed or eliminated entirely if it is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health. A restriction on parenting time must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence and accompanied by a detailed demonstration of the physical or emotional harm likely to result from visitation. |
|
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-reference w/20100230)
2012 ND 233 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Waslaski v. State (consolidated w/ 20120292 & 20120293, cross reference in memo)
2012 ND 232 Highlight: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
|
Jordet, et al. v. Jordet
2012 ND 231
Highlight: The equitable remedy of setoff will be exercised to promote substantial justice and rests largely in the sound discretion of the district court. |
|
State v. Jirinzu
2012 ND 230 Highlight: A district court criminal judgment revoking David Jirinzu's probation and sentencing him to eighteen months of imprisonment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and 35.1(a)(7). |