Opinions

Kershaw v. WSI 2013 ND 186
Docket No.: 20130131
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Separation of powers prevents the Supreme Court from making independent findings of fact or substituting its judgment for that of the agency fact finder.
In WSI cases, a presumption may not be established favoring one doctor's opinion over another's. To resolve a conflicting medical opinion, an organization may consider the nature and length of the treatment relationship, the amount of evidence in support of the opinion, the opinion's consistency with the record, possible bias, whether the doctor specializes in the issues relevant to the opinion, and other relevant factors.

Rustad v. Rustad 2013 ND 185
Docket No.: 20130105
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: In determining primary residential responsibility, the district court is required to consider all of the best interest factors and make findings with sufficient specificity to enable the reviewing court to understand the factual basis for the court's decision.
Parental alienation is a significant factor in determining primary residential responsibility.

State v. Howard 2013 ND 184
Docket No.: 20120422
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Issues not raised at the trial court level, even constitutional issues, generally will not be addressed for the first time on appeal.
The district court should generally wait to rule on a motion for a change of venue until after voir dire has been conducted to determine whether it is possible to select a fair and impartial jury.
In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, a criminal judgment will be affirmed if the judgment is supported by substantial evidence.

State v. Whitman 2013 ND 183
Docket No.: 20120374
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Plain error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b) may be noticed by the Court on its own motion.
N.D.R.App.P. 2 may be invoked to avoid manifest injustice and provide a defendant with the same relief granted his codefendant.
A defendant's use of the word lawyer during an interview is ambiguous when coupled with conduct evidencing the defendant wishes not to remain silent.

State v. Arot 2013 ND 182
Docket No.: 20120379
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: For the district court to have jurisdiction, the State must prove, by the preponderance of the evidence, that a defendant is not a minor.
There is no irrebuttable presumption that a defendant's date of birth stated on official documents is his actual date of birth.

State v. Johnson 2013 ND 181
Docket No.: 20130144
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Beauclair v. Vanderveer 2013 ND 180
Docket No.: 20130115
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Divorce judgment distributing the parties' property under the terms of a premarital agreement is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Sweeney v. Kirby (cross-reference w/20120339) 2013 ND 179
Docket No.: 20130152
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of a motion to modify primary residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Clements 2013 ND 178
Docket No.: 20130140
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A crimnal judgment for disorderly conduct is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

State v. Goulet 2013 ND 177
Docket No.: 20130148
Filing Date: 10/22/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment for aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).