Opinions

Weinreis, et al. v. Hill, et al. 2006 ND 170
Docket No.: 20060026
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A principal is bound by acts of his agent under a merely ostensible authority to those persons only who in good faith and without ordinary negligence have incurred a liability or parted with value upon the faith thereof.
A district court's determination of negligence is a finding of fact which will not be set aside on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.

State v. Salveson (Consolidated w/20060016) 2006 ND 169
Docket No.: 20060015
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A trial court is allowed the widest range of discretion in criminal sentencing.
Multiple class A misdemeanor offenses may be deemed by the sentencing court to involve substantially different criminal objectives if they do not fall under one of the following three categories: (1) one offense is an included offense of the other; (2) one offense consists of a conspiracy, attempt, solicitation, or other form of preparation to commit, or facilitation of, the other; or (3) the offenses differ only in that one is defined to prohibit a designated kind of conduct generally and the other to prohibit a specific instance of such conduct.
The crimes of aggravated reckless driving and driving while under the influence constitute two crimes with substantially different criminal objectives.

State v. Campbell (Consolidated w/20050337 & 20050338) 2006 ND 168
Docket No.: 20050326
Filing Date: 7/27/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the admission of out-of-court testimonial statements in criminal cases is precluded, unless the witness is unavailable to testify and the accused has had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
A defendant can waive a potential Confrontation Clause violation by failing to exercise a statutorily defined opportunity to subpoena the author of the state crime laboratory report.

The Ramsey Financial Corp. v. Haugland, et al. 2006 ND 167
Docket No.: 20050375
Filing Date: 7/26/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Corporations
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Voluntary acquiescence in a judgment waives the right to appeal.
Absent fraud, the procedure for asserting dissenting shareholders' rights under N.D.C.C. 10-19.1-87 and 10-19.1-88 is an exclusive remedy.

Dahl, et al. v. Messmer, et al. 2006 ND 166
Docket No.: 20050426
Filing Date: 7/24/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: On appeal, the substantive evidentiary standard of proof is considered when reviewing a motion for summary judgment.
Fraud is never presumed, but must be proved by evidence that is clear and convincing.
A party seeking to reform a contract must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the written agreement does not fully or truly state the agreement the parties intended to make.
General expressions of opinion by a seller, commending of the thing he is selling, are not actionable even though not entirely true.
Generally, statements of value and predictions of future earnings or profits fall within the class of statements whose truth or falsity cannot be precisely determined and which are not, therefore, actionable as misrepresentations of fact.

Frisk v. Frisk 2006 ND 165
Docket No.: 20050391
Filing Date: 7/21/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A domestic violence protection order may be extended upon request made prior to the order's expiration.
After a case has been remanded, the district court must cure any defects, but may do so in any manner consistent with the appellate court's opinion and conformable to law and justice.

Disciplinary Board v. Balerud 2006 ND 164
Docket No.: 20060165
Filing Date: 7/20/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Molitor v. Molitor 2006 ND 163
Docket No.: 20040041
Filing Date: 7/18/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A trial court's custody decision is a finding of fact that will not be set aside on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.
A trial court's findings of fact in child custody cases should be stated with sufficient specificity to enable the appellate court to understand the factual basis for the court's decision.
The failure to raise the issue of judicial bias in the trial court precludes appellate court review on appeal.
When a party seeking modification of custody within two years of issuance of a custody order does not prove any of the grounds listed under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.6(5) as a basis for modification, the trial court does not err in denying a motion to change custody.

Riemers v. State, et al. 2006 ND 162
Docket No.: 20050433
Filing Date: 7/18/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Absent personal jurisdiction, a court is powerless to do anything beyond dismissing a case without prejudice.

Lautt v. Lautt 2006 ND 161
Docket No.: 20050373
Filing Date: 7/18/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The standard of review for child support determinations depends on the issue appealed: a de novo standard applies to questions of law; a clearly erroneous standard applies to questions of fact; and an abuse of discretion standard applies to discretionary matters.
A district court errs by failing to close the record following the hearing and to address a child support modification motion.