Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5241 - 5250 of 12359 results
State v. Garten
2006 ND 38 Highlight: Denials of a motion to suppress, motion to sever the counts against the defendant, and a motion for new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Klein
2006 ND 37 Highlight: Conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
Maynard v. McNett
2006 ND 36
Highlight: When divorced parents share custody, the designation of a single custodian is not required, each parent can be declared a custodian, and both parents have all the legal rights designated to a custodial parent. |
Preference Personnel, Inc. v. Peterson
2006 ND 35
Highlight: The Department of Labor may not issue retroactive licenses for employment agencies. |
Stein v. Workforce Safety and Ins., et al.
2006 ND 34
Highlight: A court cannot ignore the clear language of a statute under the guise of liberal construction. |
MBNA v. Hart
2006 ND 33 Highlight: A court must confirm an arbitration award upon application of any party to the award unless a party has filed a motion with the court to vacate, modify, or correct the award within 90 days after delivery of a copy of the award, or within 90 days after grounds are known or should have been known to the injured party if the motion to vacate is based on corruption, fraud, or other undue means. |
Davis v. Killu, et al.
2006 ND 32
Highlight: An expert's testimony may not be used merely as a conduit to place otherwise inadmissible evidence before a jury. |
Bertsch v. Bertsch
2006 ND 31
Highlight: In deciding whether to award attorney fees under N.D.C.C. § 14-05-23, the trial court must balance one party's needs against the other party's ability to pay. |
Interest of D.D., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/ 20050177)
2006 ND 30
Highlight: Findings of fact in juvenile proceedings will not be set aside on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Simon v. Simon (Consolidated w/20050356)
2006 ND 29 Highlight: The offset provisions of the split custody and equal custody regulations of the child support guidelines continue to apply to the parents' child support obligations when one parent assigns the right to receive child support to the State as reimbursement for TANF benefits received. |