Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5271 - 5280 of 12382 results
Bertsch v. Bertsch
2006 ND 31
Highlight: In deciding whether to award attorney fees under N.D.C.C. § 14-05-23, the trial court must balance one party's needs against the other party's ability to pay. |
Interest of D.D., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/ 20050177)
2006 ND 30
Highlight: Findings of fact in juvenile proceedings will not be set aside on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Simon v. Simon (Consolidated w/20050356)
2006 ND 29 Highlight: The offset provisions of the split custody and equal custody regulations of the child support guidelines continue to apply to the parents' child support obligations when one parent assigns the right to receive child support to the State as reimbursement for TANF benefits received. |
Schwan v. Folden
2006 ND 28
Highlight: If a plaintiff does not move for default judgment after the default has occurred or within a reasonable time after the default, and the answer is subsequently filed, the plaintiff waives its right to default judgment for a defendant's failure to appear. |
Lentz v. Spryncznatyk
2006 ND 27
Highlight: A statute is employed retroactively when it is applied to a cause of action that arose prior to the effective date of the statute. |
Dunn v. State
2006 ND 26
Highlight: A motion for summary dismissal under the Uniform Post-Conviction Relief Act is akin to a motion for summary judgment. |
State v. Nikle
2006 ND 25
Highlight: Great weight is given to a potential juror's claim that he or she will maintain impartiality. |
Wheeler v. Gardner
2006 ND 24
Highlight: An inmate's responsibility for costs of a medical visit is not limited to a maximum of $10, but rather an inmate is responsible for the actual health care costs plus an additional $10 fee for each medical visit requested by the inmate. |
Hilgers v. Hilgers (Cross-ref w/20010208 & 20030252)
2006 ND 23 |
Interest of B.V. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 22
Highlight: An order committing a sexually dangerous individual will be affirmed unless it is induced by an erroneous view of the law or it is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. |