Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5261 - 5270 of 12382 results
State v. Ernst
2006 ND 41
Highlight: The writ of audita querela has been abolished in North Dakota. |
Ficklin v. Ficklin (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 40
Highlight: Before a court may enter a protection order, there must be a showing of actual or imminent domestic violence. |
State v. Stewart (Consolidated w/20050080 thru 20050086)
2006 ND 39
Highlight: The Court looks at the "totality of the circumstances" on appeal, giving deference to the district court's findings, to determine whether a search warrant was supported by probable cause. |
State v. Garten
2006 ND 38 Highlight: Denials of a motion to suppress, motion to sever the counts against the defendant, and a motion for new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Klein
2006 ND 37 Highlight: Conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
Maynard v. McNett
2006 ND 36
Highlight: When divorced parents share custody, the designation of a single custodian is not required, each parent can be declared a custodian, and both parents have all the legal rights designated to a custodial parent. |
Preference Personnel, Inc. v. Peterson
2006 ND 35
Highlight: The Department of Labor may not issue retroactive licenses for employment agencies. |
Stein v. Workforce Safety and Ins., et al.
2006 ND 34
Highlight: A court cannot ignore the clear language of a statute under the guise of liberal construction. |
MBNA v. Hart
2006 ND 33 Highlight: A court must confirm an arbitration award upon application of any party to the award unless a party has filed a motion with the court to vacate, modify, or correct the award within 90 days after delivery of a copy of the award, or within 90 days after grounds are known or should have been known to the injured party if the motion to vacate is based on corruption, fraud, or other undue means. |
Davis v. Killu, et al.
2006 ND 32
Highlight: An expert's testimony may not be used merely as a conduit to place otherwise inadmissible evidence before a jury. |