Opinions

State v. Steen 2005 ND 199
Docket No.: 20050216
Filing Date: 11/29/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying motion for a new trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Croaker 2005 ND 198
Docket No.: 20050145
Filing Date: 11/29/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of simple assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Johnson v. State (Cross-Ref. w/20050028 & 20050029) 2005 ND 197
Docket No.: 20050168
Filing Date: 11/29/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of contact by bodily fluids is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Stevenson 2005 ND 196
Docket No.: 20050134
Filing Date: 11/29/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Judicial Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Judicial District 2005 ND 195
Docket No.: 20050369
Filing Date: 11/17/2005
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bottineau.

Interest of J.F. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2005 ND 194
Docket No.: 20050046
Filing Date: 11/15/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Orders finding a child to be unruly and deprived are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Wild Rice River Estates v. City of Fargo 2005 ND 193
Docket No.: 20050074
Filing Date: 11/14/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Whether there has been a taking of private property for public use is a question of law which is fully reviewable on appeal, but a trial court's findings of fact on a takings claim will not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous.
A temporary deprivation of all economically viable use of property does not necessarily constitute a taking of property requiring compensation.
An extraordinary delay in governmental decisionmaking coupled with bad faith on the part of the governmental body may result in a compensable taking of property.

Klose v. State (cross-reference w/20010309) 2005 ND 192
Docket No.: 20050044
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An appellant failing to file a trial transcript on appeal assumes the risks and consequences of such failure.

State v. Laib 2005 ND 191
Docket No.: 20050099
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: For the crime of terrorizing, the critical inquiry is whether the defendant intended to place others in fear for their safety.
For the crime of terrorizing, a threat does not have to be made verbally.
For the crime of terrorizing, a communication, either verbal or nonverbal, is sufficient to be a threat if a reasonable person could conclude that it was a threat under the circumstances.

Wetzel v. Schlenvogt (CONSOLIDATED W/20050122) 2005 ND 190
Docket No.: 20050121
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A corporation may not be represented by a non-attorney agent in a legal proceeding.
When a case is commenced on behalf of a corporation by a non-attorney agent, the case and all documents signed by the non-attorney agent are void from the beginning.
Reasonable grounds exist for obtaining a disorderly conduct restraining order when the facts and circumstances presented to the judge are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that acts constituting disorderly conduct have been committed.
A disorderly conduct restraining order does not require a pattern of behavior.
The district court does not abuse its discretion in granting a disorderly conduct restraining order when there is sufficient, admissible evidence that disorderly conduct has been committed, whether that evidence is received on direct examination or cross-examination.
Whenever there is a discrepancy between a trial court's oral and written statements, the written statement controls.