-
Amendments to Rule 2.1(B), North Dakota Rules for Lawyer Discipline
-
Amendments to North Dakota Rules for Lawyer Discipline and North Dakota Rules of the Judicial Conduct Commission
-
On September 2, 1998, the Court Services Administration Committee petitioned the Court for amendments to Administrative Rule 19, regarding the services of the State Records Administrator in the Court Records Management Program. The Court considered the matter, and
-
On July 15, 1998, the Supreme Court adopted amendments to Administrative Policy 106 thereby creating one personnel advisory board. To facilitate the creation of one personnel advisory board, amendments to Administrative Rule 33 were proposed. The Court considered the matter, and
-
The Joint Committee on Attorney Standards proposed amendments to the North Dakota Admission to Practice Rules regarding conditional admission and licensure. The proposed amendments are attached.
-
Proposed Amendments to the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rules of Court and the North Dakota Century Code
-
Amendments to North Dakota Rules of Court, Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules of Evidence, Rule on Procedural Rules, Administrative Rules and Administrative Orders of the North Dakota Supreme Court, Rule on Local Court Procedural Rules and Administrative Rules, North Dakota Supreme Court Administrative Rules and Administrative Orders, Code of Judicial Conduct, Rules of the Judicial Conduct Commission, Rules of Professional Conduct, Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, Rules for Lawyer Discipline, Rules for Continuing Legal Education, Admission to Practice Rules, and the Rule on the Limited Practice of Law by Law Students
-
In January 1998, the Gender Fairness Implementation Committee submitted amendments to the Commentary to Canon 3B(5) and (6) of the North Dakota Code of Judicial Conduct to the Judiciary Standards Committee. In February 1998, the Judiciary Standards Committee considered the amendments through a mail ballot and submitted proposed amendments to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court re-referred the amendments to the Judiciary Standards Committee and requested it to conduct a meeting, either in-person or by conference call, to provide for discussion of the amendments. The Judiciary Standards committee met on May 8, 1998, and reviewed the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments were forwarded to the Supreme Court for approval on June 12, 1998.
-
Proposed Amendments to North Dakota Rules for Lawyer Discipline and North Dakota Rules of the Judicial Conduct Commission
-
Notice is hereby given that on April 13, 1998, the Honorable Benny A. Graff, Presiding Judge of the South Central Judicial District, filed a Petition for Change of Designation of Resident District Court Judgeship Chamber under Administrative Rule 7.1(2), requesting the Supreme Court to change the designation of District Court Judgeship No. 8, with chambers at Linton, North Dakota, to chambers at Mandan, North Dakota, previously occupied by Judgeship No. 3 which was abolished effective March 11, 1998.
-
In the Matter of the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 5 in the Chamber at Bismarck, North Dakota, South Central Judicial District
-
ORDERED, that pursuant to Section 27-05-02.1(4), N.D.C.C., the Supreme Court will consult with the judges and attorneys of the South Central Judicial District, in the courtroom of the Supreme Court at the State Capitol, in Bismarck, North Dakota, at 10:45 a.m., April 29, 1998, on the following issues:
-
Rules on Continuing Judicial Education
Effective April 1, 1998
-
Magistrates--Qualifications, Authority, Education and Procedures
Effective April 1, 1998
-
Designation of Judgeships and Chambers with Assignments
Effective April 1, 1998
-
On March 11, 1998, the Honorable Bruce E. Bohlman, Judge of the District Court for the Northeast Central Judicial District, petitioned the Court for an extension of the term limit of Rule 8.5, North Dakota Rules of Court (NDROC), for an additional 18 months. Rule 8.5, NDROC, is scheduled to terminate on April 1, 1998. On March 23, 1998, the Honorable Robert W. Holte, Judge of the District Court for the Northwest Judicial District, filed a letter in support of Judge Bohlman's petition
-
In the Matter of the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 3 in the Chamber at Mandan, North Dakota, South Central Judicial District
-
In the Matter of the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 3 in the Chamber at Mandan, North Dakota, South Central Judicial District
-
In the Matter of the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 3, In the Chamber at Minot, North Dakota, Northwest Judicial District
-
In the Matter of the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 1 in the Chamber at Jamestown, North Dakota, Southeast Judicial District
-
In the Matter of the Judicial Vacancy in District Judgeship No. 1 in the Chamber at Jamestown, North Dakota, Southeast Judicial District
-
On December 31, 1997, Wallace J. Berning, District Judge for the Northwest Judicial District, notified this Court that he will not be seeking reelection when his term expires thus creating a vacancy under Section 27-05-02.1(4), N.D.C.C. Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C., requires the Supreme Court to determine whether the vacancy should be filled.
-
On January 8, 1998, William F. Hodny, District Judge for the South Central Judicial District, notified this Court that he will not be seeking reelection when his term expires, thus creating a vacancy under Section 27-05-02.1(4), N.D.C.C. Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C., requires the Supreme Court to determine whether the vacancy should be filled.
-
On July 10, 1997, the Joint Procedure Committee filed a Petition for Adoption, Amendment, or Repeal of Procedural Court Rules under Section 3, NDRPR, recommending amendments to Rules 4, 5, 38, 50, 52, 54, and 59, NDRCivP; Rules 5.1, 17.1, 33, 43, Forms 7, 7(a), 7(b), and 8, NDRCrimP; Rules 412 and 804, NDREv; Rules 2.1, 4, 10, 30 and 35.1, NDRAppP; Rules 6.7 and 6.8, NDROC; and Administrative Rule 39.
-
On July 10, 1997, the Joint Procedure Committee filed a Petition for Adoption, Amendment, or Repeal of Procedural Court Rules under Section 3, NDRPR, recommending amendments to Rules 4, 5, 38, 50, 52, 54, and 59, NDRCivP; Rules 5.1, 17.1, 33, 43, Forms 7, 7(a), 7(b), and 8, NDRCrimP; Rules 412 and 804, NDREv; Rules 2.1, 4, 10, 30 and 35.1, NDRAppP; Rules 6.7 and 6.8, NDROC; and Administrative Rule 39. A Notice of Hearing was served under Section 7, NDRPR, for a hearing on the proposed amendments and the submission of written comments. Written comments were referred to the Court and on October 30, 1997, the Court heard argument on the proposed amendments. At the time of the hearing, the Joint Procedure Committee recommended revised amendments to Rule 4, NDRCivP, and Rule 6.8, NDROC. The Court considered the matter, and
